
Sounds nice. And the economic case is compelling. But in my mind the most important point comes in this passage:
"From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you."
This marketing issue seems like a more important factor than dropping costs. Sometimes price is determined by cost of production plus a margin, but just as often it's determined by what the consumer is willing to pay. So even if your costs are zero, you'll still charge if someone is willing to pay for what you're selling. The big difference with free is that people don't need to think about it as a value proposition at all. So as a seller you need to do very little convincing.
The big bonus of free that Anderson doesn't talk about is elimination of the need for a payment mechanism. Despite all the internet's advances in the last few years, buying something online is still a huge pain in the ass. But as soon as you can get something to somebody online for free, the hassle of credit cards and paypals and whatever else goes away.
No comments:
Post a Comment