Saturday, December 20, 2008
India and China in The Economist
Last week's issue of The Economist had a survey with eight articles covering the range of issues facing India and an interesting piece about the different ways the current economic outlook threatens India and China. If you're interested in either of these topics, check it out.
The China/India comparison is fascinating. I'm more than a little concerned about social unrest in China over the next few years. Their economic growth has been massively dependent on exports to consumers in the West. And two months ago those consumers buying. As factories in China close, a lot of people are going to be out on the streets and angry. And historically, China has been vulnerable to social unrest. Look for whether their businesses are able to respond to the new environment and how successful the government is in quelling public demonstrations.
For all its inefficiency and corruption, India's democracy at least provides a pressure valve for its society's discontents.
In case you haven't had your fill...
...of articles about the election, here's a really great piece in Newsweek about the three major campaigns for president and how they were run. Newsweek's reporters were given inside access to the Obama, Clinton and McCain campaigns . In return they agreed not to publish the story until after the election. The result is an in depth profile of all three candidates and the way their teams managed their campaigns. Says a lot about the quality of the candidates.
Really...?
My impression is that many of India's strengths in the current economic environment came from a failure to liberalize the economy. But perhaps there was more forethought in that then I was aware of. I just hope we don't hear that the government has avoided investing in physical infrastructure and reforming labor laws because that might have led to an unhealthy dependence on manufacturing exports.
Let's try this again...
Stop blogging for a few months and the whole world goes to pot.
So, I got a bit distracted with things over the last couple of months and the blog fell through the cracks (also, there's a new firewall at work, which prevents me from procrastinating in this particular venue). But now, with all the crises going on around the world I find I'm emailing a lot of interesting articles to friends. Then I remembered, "Hey, didn't I used to have a blog... and can't you use blogs to post you read so others can read them too..." Yup.
So let's give this blogging thing another shot...
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Now, I'm not saying you shouldn't trust central-african dictators-for-life, but isn't "dream house and untold riches" awfully ambiguous? Before winning the gold, you might want to see that house and be told just what sort of riches he has in mind. Then again, maybe its better not to look a gift horse in the mouth.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
And we're back!
I'll try to be more diligent in the coming months about posting regularly. Lots of interesting reading about Architecture, India, Technology, Society, etc. to share with you. So I hope you check back in!
Since the last post, I've gotten to see what the mystery of Bhutan is all about, catch up with some good friends from around the world, and figure out a little bit more of what I want to do with myself. Life moves quickly. You can't stand in the window watching for too long (but if you do, it helps to have a good friend with you).
Sunday, June 8, 2008
Building the Cities of the Future
Great article in the NYTimes Magazine about the creation of new megacities that is going on in places like China and the Middle East. In the last 20-30 years metropolises like Shenzhen have gone from being unremarkable villages to having 8 or 10 million inhabitant. As you can imagine, this throws a bit of a monkey wrench into existing theories of architecture and urban development.
'Cities like these, built on a colossal scale, seem to absorb any urban model, no matter how unique, virtually unnoticed. A project that could have a significant impact on the character of, say, New York — like the development plans for ground zero — can seem a mere blip in Beijing, which has embarked on dozens of similarly sized endeavors in the last decade alone. “The irony is that we still don’t know if postmodernism was the end of Modernism or just an interruption,” Koolhaas told me recently. “Was it a brief hiatus, and now we are returning to something that has been going on for a long time, or is it something radically different? We are in a condition we don’t understand yet.”'
However the theory works out, these cities aren't waiting. They'll be built in whatever way they can manage because the economic growth in the region demands it. I wonder how we will look back at them in 50 years -- as collossal mistakes or remnants of a tremendously creative era?
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Architects Without Borders?
Friday, April 18, 2008
Jean Nouvel
So you want to live forever...
"But the crucial thing that Kurzweil did was to make the end of the human era seem actionable: He argues that while artificial intelligence will render biological humans obsolete, it will not make human consciousness irrelevant. The first AIs will be created, he says, as add-ons to human intelligence, modeled on our actual brains and used to extend our human reach. AIs will help us see and hear better. They will give us better memories and help us fight disease. Eventually, AIs will allow us to conquer death itself. The singularity won't destroy us, Kurzweil says. Instead, it will immortalize us."
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
The Difference Between Paris and Mumbai
Sunday, March 30, 2008
There's got to be a way to prosecute this...
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Andreessen on Obama
What's the picture that emerges from these four impressions?
Smart, normal, curious, not radical, and post-Boomer.
If you were asking me to write a capsule description of what I would look for in the next President of the United States, that would be it.
Having met him and then having watched him for the last 12 months run one of the best-executed and cleanest major presidential campaigns in recent memory, I have no doubt that Senator Obama has the judgment, bearing, intellect, and high ethical standards to be an outstanding president -- completely aside from the movement that has formed around him, and in complete contradition to the silly assertions by both the Clinton and McCain campaigns that he's somehow not ready.
Before I close, let me share two specific things he said at the time -- early 2007 -- on the topic of whether he's ready.
We asked him directly, how concerned should we be that you haven't had meaningful experience as an executive -- as a manager and leader of people?
He said, watch how I run my campaign -- you'll see my leadership skills in action.
At the time, I wasn't sure what to make of his answer -- political campaigns are often very messy and chaotic, with a lot of turnover and flux; what conclusions could we possibly draw from one of those?
Well, as any political expert will tell you, it turns out that the Obama campaign has been one of the best organized and executed presidential campaigns in memory. Even Obama's opponents concede that his campaign has been disciplined, methodical, and effective across the full spectrum of activities required to win -- and with a minimum of the negative campaigning and attack ads that normally characterize a race like this, and with almost no staff turnover. By almost any measure, the Obama campaign has simply out-executed both the Clinton and McCain campaigns.
This speaks well to the Senator's ability to run a campaign, but speaks even more to his ability to recruit and manage a top-notch group of campaign professionals and volunteers -- another key leadership characteristic. When you compare this to the awe-inspiring discord, infighting, and staff turnover within both the Clinton and McCain campaigns up to this point -- well, let's just say it's a very interesting data point.
We then asked, well, what about foreign policy -- should we be concerned that you just don't have much experience there?
He said, directly, two things.
First, he said, I'm on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where I serve with a number of Senators who are widely regarded as leading experts on foreign policy -- and I can tell you that I know as much about foreign policy at this point as most of them.
Being a fan of blunt answers, I liked that one.
But then he made what I think is the really good point.
He said -- and I'm going to paraphrase a little here: think about who I am -- my father was Kenyan; I have close relatives in a small rural village in Kenya to this day; and I spent several years of my childhood living in Jakarta, Indonesia. Think about what it's going to mean in many parts of the world -- parts of the world that we really care about -- when I show up as the President of the United States. I'll be fundamentally changing the world's perception of what the United States is all about.
He's got my vote.
Thanks to Cardiff for the link to this post.
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Why Cities Are Our Future...
- "UN-Habitat says that a staggering 95 percent of the expected global population growth we will see over the next 2 decades will be absorbed by cities in the developing world... What that means is by 2030 another 2 billion people from the developing world will be living in cities (only 100 million from the developed world meanwhile will be doing the same). Currently 75 percent of world's poorest people -- 1 billion -- live in cities."
- "Already, 75 percent of the world's 21 mega-cities are based in the developing world, and by some estimates, 27 of the 33 mega-cities expected to exist by 2015 will be in developing countries."
- "Cities have always traditionally been the centers of the world's wealth, and the World Bank says that as much as 80 percent of the future economic growth of the developing world will come from its cities."
- "In the next 30 years, China alone will have around 752 million urbanites, all needing to get around town. Currently, less than 1 percent of Chinese own a car... If each of those 752 million city dwellers copied the transportation habits of your average resident of San Francisco in 1990, the actions of that one country would result in 1 billion additional tons of carbon emissions a year -- the same amount that was released worldwide by all road transport in 1998."
Thursday, March 13, 2008
The Other Side Of The Story
An Oldie, But A Goodie
This Is Pretty Funny...
"When your main campaign theme is foreign policy experience, and that experience is persuasively refuted by a comedian, it's time to find a new theme."
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
In Dubai, This Sort of Thing Is Completely Normal
NYTimes.com article about Rem Koolhaas' plan to build a slice of lower manhattan on a man made island off the Dubai coast. Amazing. 1.5 BILLION square feet of development. A 44-story spherical tower... and it's not even remotely the most ambitious development in the city. Seriously, I woke up this morning in a house built on a frond of the world's biggest palm tree. On the way in form the airport, we passed the world's tallest building. And I'm shooting for the skiing trifecta of water, snow and sand before the weekend is over. I have no idea how I feel about all this yet.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
A. Garrett Lisi Fanclub
"Surfing and snowboarding are what I do for fun -- to get out and play in nature. We live in a beautiful universe, and I wish to enjoy it and understand it as best I can. And I try to live a balanced life. Surfing is simply the most fun I know how to have on this planet. And physics, and science in general, is the best way of understanding how everything works. So this is what I spend my time doing. I do what I love, and follow my interests. Shouldn't everyone?"
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Not So Lite After All
Ship-Rescuing Awesomeness
Monday, February 25, 2008
Why Everything On The Internet Will Be Free
Sounds nice. And the economic case is compelling. But in my mind the most important point comes in this passage:
"From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you."
This marketing issue seems like a more important factor than dropping costs. Sometimes price is determined by cost of production plus a margin, but just as often it's determined by what the consumer is willing to pay. So even if your costs are zero, you'll still charge if someone is willing to pay for what you're selling. The big difference with free is that people don't need to think about it as a value proposition at all. So as a seller you need to do very little convincing.
The big bonus of free that Anderson doesn't talk about is elimination of the need for a payment mechanism. Despite all the internet's advances in the last few years, buying something online is still a huge pain in the ass. But as soon as you can get something to somebody online for free, the hassle of credit cards and paypals and whatever else goes away.
Friday, February 22, 2008
But Most of The Time...
... I'm not sorry I live on the other side of the world. Anyway, T-minus 3 hrs til the big 28. Time to get changed.
Sick New MoMA Exhibit
Thursday, February 21, 2008
The Guardian, The Idealist and The Artisan...
.
.
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Against Waterboarding
"TWENTY-SEVEN years ago, in the final days of the Iran hostage crisis, the C.I.A.’s Tehran station chief, Tom Ahern, faced his principal interrogator for the last time. The interrogator said the abuse Mr. Ahern had suffered was inconsistent with his own personal values and with the values of Islam and, as if to wipe the slate clean, he offered Mr. Ahern a chance to abuse him just as he had abused the hostages. Mr. Ahern looked the interrogator in the eyes and said, “We don’t do stuff like that.”"
Here's a description of what waterboarding actually is for anyone who's curious.
Of Booms and Busts
An article in the New Yorker describes how Wall Street tends to contribute to destabilizing boom and bust cycles. The theory was put forward by Hyman P. Minsky in the late '80s. It calls for more regulation on Wall Street to prevent things like the sub-prime mortgage crisis from happening. In a nutshell:
"There are basically five stages in Minsky’s model of the credit cycle: displacement, boom, euphoria, profit taking, and panic. A displacement occurs when investors get excited about something—an invention, such as the Internet, or a war, or an abrupt change of economic policy. The current cycle began in 2003, with the Fed chief Alan Greenspan’s decision to reduce short-term interest rates to one per cent, and an unexpected influx of foreign money, particularly Chinese money, into U.S. Treasury bonds. With the cost of borrowing—mortgage rates, in particular—at historic lows, a speculative real-estate boom quickly developed that was much bigger, in terms of over-all valuation, than the previous bubble in technology stocks.
As a boom leads to euphoria, Minsky said, banks and other commercial lenders extend credit to ever more dubious borrowers, often creating new financial instruments to do the job. During the nineteen-eighties, junk bonds played that role. More recently, it was the securitization of mortgages, which enabled banks to provide home loans without worrying if they would ever be repaid. (Investors who bought the newfangled securities would be left to deal with any defaults.) Then, at the top of the market (in this case, mid-2006), some smart traders start to cash in their profits.
...The theory calls for increased regulation on Wall Street to decrease their contribution to the swings of the cycle.
Friday, February 15, 2008
The Greatest Wine Ever
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
It's Complicated...
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Bill Baker of Skidmore, Owings and Merrill
3 Facts For Those Of Us Born In A Leap Year...
1) A leap year is any year evenly divisible by four — except for century years, which have to be divisible by 400. It's not a perfect system: The Gregorian year is 27 seconds longer than the astronomical year. By 12008, we'll be three days off.
2) October 5-14, 1582, never happened in Catholic lands. Brits (and their American subjects) born September 3 to 13 had no birthday in 1752. Those days were dropped when the Western world switched from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar.
3) International Atomic Time — kept by ultraprecise clocks — is gradually out-pacing astronomical time, which is determined by our planet's rotation. (Earth's spin is slowing — what a drag.) So in 1972, the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service began adding occasional leap seconds. They've done it 23 times, most recently adding an extra "one-Mississippi" on December 31, 2005.
How The iPhone Blew Up The Wireless Industry
Monday, February 11, 2008
A Little-Mentioned Motivation For Peace...
Body Language Does The Talking
Sunday, February 10, 2008
One Cloud to Rule Them All
Profile of Defense Secretary Bob Gates
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Think Global, Teach Local?
* Another follow-up article in the Times on Education City in Qatar.